Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 2.0 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 238 - 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 400 - 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 8.0 - 12.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2013 petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro 2016. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.34 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 2013 is 5 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro 2016, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro 2013 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | ~ 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 20 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |