Chevrolet Camaro 2013 vs Audi S5 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Audi S5 is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.2 | 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 323 - 432 HP | 333 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 - 569 NM | 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 6.2 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.9 - 14.1 | 8.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi S5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.36 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 20 cm longer than the Audi S5, 6 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 364 litres | 455 litres | |
|
Audi S5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Camaro has 91 litres less trunk space than the Audi S5. This could mean that the Chevrolet Camaro uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`200 | ~ 2`175 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 800 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Audi S5 has
| |