Chevrolet Camaro 2018 vs Lexus LC 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Lexus LC is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 | 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 650 HP | 477 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 868 NM | 540 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 5.9 seconds | 4.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 - 15.7 | 13.1 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Lexus LC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.35 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro is 1 cm longer than the Lexus LC, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 257 litres | 197 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Camaro has 60 litres more trunk space than the Lexus LC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.8 metres more than that of the Lexus LC, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`690 | ~ 2`375 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Lexus LC has
| |