Chevrolet Camaro 2018 vs Ford Mustang 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 | 2.3 - 5.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 275 - 650 HP | 310 - 760 HP | |
| Torque: | 365 - 868 NM | 475 - 847 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.2 - 5.7 seconds | 4.4 - 5.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 - 15.7 | 8.0 - 16.8 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.35 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 257 litres | 408 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Chevrolet Camaro has 151 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford Mustang, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`120 kg | ~ 2`132 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`630 kg | ~ 1`688 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 490 kg | ~ 444 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 28 400 | 33 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |