Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs BMW 5 series 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while BMW 5 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 (petrol) | 2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 453 HP | 143 - 560 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 617 NM | 270 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | 4.4 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 12.8 | 4.5 - 9.9 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.46 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 12 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`160 | ~ 2`309 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |