Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Kia Sportage 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Kia Sportage can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 (petrol) | 1.6 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Sportage is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 453 HP | 115 - 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 617 NM | 165 - 382 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | 9.8 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 12.8 | 5.7 - 9.2 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Sportage. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Camaro is 34 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 32 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1547 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 1 metres more than that of the Kia Sportage, which means Chevrolet Camaro can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`160 | ~ 2`064 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Kia Sportage has
| |