Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Jaguar F-Type 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Jaguar F-Type can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 | 3.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 453 HP | 340 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 617 NM | 450 - 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | 4.1 - 5.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 12.8 | 8.4 - 11.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar F-Type. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is 30 cm longer than the Jaguar F-Type, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 310 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 408 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.3 metres more than that of the Jaguar F-Type. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`160 | ~ 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jaguar F-Type has
| |