Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Dodge Charger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chevrolet Camaro is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Dodge Charger is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Camaro is available only with rear wheel drive, while Dodge Charger can be equipped with front wheel drive and rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 | 3.6 - 6.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 453 HP | 296 - 707 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 617 NM | 353 - 881 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 12.8 | 10.0 - 14.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is smaller. Chevrolet Camaro is 29 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 467 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`160 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |