Chevrolet Camaro 2016 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Cabrio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 6.2 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 238 - 453 HP | 315 - 430 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 - 617 NM | 370 - 556 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.6 - 5.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 - 12.8 | 10.6 - 11.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro 2016 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro 2011. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Camaro 2016 is 5 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro 2011, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Camaro 2016 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Camaro 2016 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Camaro 2011. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`160 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 600 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Camaro has
|
| |