Chevrolet Blazer 2020 vs Volvo XC90 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 230 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo XC90, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 71 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo XC90 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Volvo S60, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60, Volvo S90 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo XC90 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volvo XC90 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.93 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.78 m | |
| Chevrolet Blazer is 9 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 864 litres | 368 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1818 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Blazer has 496 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`722 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 49 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |