Chevrolet Blazer 2020 vs Toyota Corolla 2007
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 237 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 113 HP more power than Toyota Corolla, whereas torque is 193 NM more than Toyota Corolla. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Chevrolet Blazer consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Blazer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 73 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1100 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Blazer gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Blazer engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Toyota Auris | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Corolla engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 engine: This engine is considered one of the most reliable in its class and, with proper maintenance, does not cause major issues for owners. However, its performance is rather modest.
The timing chain has a ... More about Toyota Corolla 2007 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.95 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger. Chevrolet Blazer is 46 cm longer than the Toyota Corolla, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 222 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 222 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1970 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 1.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Chevrolet Blazer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`785 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |