Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 339 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 2 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 34 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 76 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.66 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.62 m | |
| Chevrolet Blazer is 40 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 932 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 1954 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`223 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |