Chevrolet Blazer 1994 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1992
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 22 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 17.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is smaller. Chevrolet Blazer is 33 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 952 litres | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1919 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Blazer has 122 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chevrolet Blazer (by 549 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |