Chevrolet Blazer 1994 vs Dodge Durango 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 45 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Dodge Durango. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 15.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.49 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is smaller. Chevrolet Blazer is 42 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 952 litres | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1919 litres | 2482 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Blazer has 417 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Durango. The Dodge Durango may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Dodge Durango (by 563 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`430 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |