Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 19 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 3 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.4 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chevrolet Malibu | Used also on Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 2.09 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger. Chevrolet Blazer is 35 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 30 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1903 litres | 965 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2010 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Blazer has 938 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 2`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |