Chevrolet Blazer 1995 vs Suzuki Vitara 1991
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 96 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, whereas torque is 221 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Blazer consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Blazer could require 780 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Blazer consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 440 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Blazer is 61 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1056 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2098 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Blazer has 476 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 1.2 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Chevrolet Blazer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`440 kg | 1`650 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`860 kg | 1`165 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 580 kg | 485 kg | |
| Chevrolet Blazer load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Suzuki Vitara. Therefore, Chevrolet Blazer is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |