Chevrolet Blazer 1995 vs Land Rover Range Rover 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Blazer) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 17.5 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 57 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover, whereas torque is 83 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 11.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.2 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Range Rover is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Blazer consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Blazer could require 330 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Blazer consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 440 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is smaller. Chevrolet Blazer is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1056 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2098 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 0.1 metres more than that of the Land Rover Range Rover. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Land Rover Range Rover has
| |