Chevrolet Blazer 1995 vs Land Rover Defender 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Blazer) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Defender) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 113 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 18.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 80 HP more power than Land Rover Defender, whereas torque is 88 NM more than Land Rover Defender. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 8.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.2 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Defender is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Blazer consumes 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Blazer could require 525 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Blazer consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Defender. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 440 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Defender gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 2.04 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Blazer is 4 cm longer than the Land Rover Defender, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 43 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1056 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2098 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 0.8 metres less than that of the Land Rover Defender, which means Chevrolet Blazer can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Land Rover Defender has
| |