Chevrolet Blazer 1995 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1992
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 22 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 17.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Blazer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Blazer consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Blazer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 530 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is smaller. Chevrolet Blazer is 18 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |