Chevrolet Blazer 1995 vs Dodge Durango 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 238 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Dodge Durango is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 45 HP less power than Dodge Durango, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Dodge Durango. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 15.4 | |
|
The Chevrolet Blazer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Blazer consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Durango, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Blazer over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| Dodge Durango gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is smaller. Chevrolet Blazer is 27 cm shorter than the Dodge Durango, width is practically the same , while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 535 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2482 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`400 | 2`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Dodge Durango has
| |