Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 3 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, but torque is 35 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 87 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Chevrolet Blazer is 11 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |