Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Mitsubishi L 200 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 95 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 186 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 75 litres | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 44 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi L 200 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi L 200 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger. Chevrolet Blazer is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |