Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Mercedes ML 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 190 HP | 218 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 28 HP less power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 13.8 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 72 litres | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 6 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Chrysler Crossfire | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
The Mercedes ML engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.61 m | 4.59 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.60 m | 1.78 m | |
Chevrolet Blazer is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 18 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 455 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`650 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes ML has
| |