Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Mercedes ML 1998

 
Chevrolet Blazer
1998 - 2005
Mercedes ML
1998 - 2001
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 4.3 Petrol3.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 190 HP218 HP
Torque: 340 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.8 seconds9.5 seconds
Mercedes ML is a more dynamic driving.
Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 28 HP less power than Mercedes ML, but torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes ML. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Blazer reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data13.8
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres72 litres

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 6 years10 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 8 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Chrysler Crossfire
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Mercedes ML engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.61 m4.59 m
Width: 1.68 m1.83 m
Height: 1.60 m1.78 m
Chevrolet Blazer is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 18 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 455 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1920 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`5002`650
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 30002400
Pros and Cons:
    Mercedes ML has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • has 4x4 drive
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv