Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.3 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 338 NM | 301 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Blazer engine produces 12 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.3 | 14.0 | |
| Chevrolet Blazer consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Blazer could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 540 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Jeep Cherokee 1997 4.0 engine: A robust engine with great resource, but also high fuel consumption. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Chevrolet Blazer is 39 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1903 litres | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 2033 litres | |
| Chevrolet Blazer has 892 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Chevrolet Blazer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`041 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |