Chevrolet Blazer 1994 vs Toyota 4-Runner 1989
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chevrolet Blazer is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota 4-Runner can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Blazer also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 4.3 (petrol) | 2.4 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Toyota 4-Runner is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 90 - 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 353 NM | 192 - 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 15.3 - 22 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 11.5 - 14.7 | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota 4-Runner. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Blazer is 10 cm longer than the Toyota 4-Runner, 7 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1056 litres | 1200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2098 litres | 2100 litres | |
|
Toyota 4-Runner has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Blazer has 144 litres less trunk space than the Toyota 4-Runner. This could mean that the Chevrolet Blazer uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota 4-Runner (by 2 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota 4-Runner, which means Chevrolet Blazer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`423 | ~ 2`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Toyota 4-Runner has
| |