Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Jeep Cherokee 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | 2.5 - 4.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 190 HP | 116 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 340 NM | 198 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | 10.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 - 14.3 | 9.5 - 14.0 | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer petrol engines consumes on average 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Cherokee. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger, but slightly lower. Chevrolet Blazer is 37 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1903 litres | 1011 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 2033 litres | |
| Chevrolet Blazer has 892 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 113 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Blazer is 1.1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Chevrolet Blazer can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`196 | ~ 2`169 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |