Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Isuzu Rodeo 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 4.3 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 190 HP | 130 - 208 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 340 NM | 195 - 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 - 14.3 | 10.5 - 12.5 | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Isuzu Rodeo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Blazer is 12 cm longer than the Isuzu Rodeo, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1903 litres | 933 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 2297 litres | |
| Chevrolet Blazer has 970 litres more trunk space than the Isuzu Rodeo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Isuzu Rodeo (by 377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`196 | ~ 2`191 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Isuzu Rodeo has
| |