Chevrolet Blazer 1998 vs Ford Excursion 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 4.3 (petrol) | 5.4 - 7.3 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 - 190 HP | 250 - 325 HP | |
| Torque: | 180 - 340 NM | 468 - 745 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 - 10.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.7 - 14.3 | 13.0 - 19.3 | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer petrol engines consumes on average 5.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Excursion. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 5.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 2.03 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is smaller. Chevrolet Blazer is 113 cm shorter than the Ford Excursion, 19 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Blazer is 33 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1903 litres | 1376 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1920 litres | 4146 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Blazer has 527 litres more trunk space than the Ford Excursion. The Ford Excursion may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Excursion (by 2226 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`196 | ~ 4`105 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Blazer has
|
Ford Excursion has
| |