Chevrolet Aveo 2012 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.7 | 4.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
| 1390 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Aveo is 9 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
698 litres | 1285 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Aveo has 89 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 587 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`647 | 1`810 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 3 has serious deffects in 115 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |