Chevrolet Aveo 2012 vs Volvo S60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 68 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 190 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.8 | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1390 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Aveo is 23 cm shorter than the Volvo S60, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
698 litres | 1749 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Chevrolet Aveo has 122 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The Volvo S60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 1051 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`675 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |