Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 9 HP more power than Suzuki Swift. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Swift is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 22 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Aveo has 22 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |