Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Suzuki Swift 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 101 HP | 102 HP | |
Torque: | n/a NM | 133 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 1 HP less power than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.5 | |
Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
Chevrolet Aveo is 23 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 213 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
Chevrolet Aveo has 7 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`485 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | low | below average | |
Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |