Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | n/a NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 17 HP more power than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.7 | |
| Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 3 2006 1.4 engine: The engine is generally robust, but the use of poor-quality fuel can lead to increased burn formation. Idling speeds tend to be unstable. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller, but slightly higher. Chevrolet Aveo is 57 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 413 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1285 litres | |
|
Mazda 3 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 193 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |