Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 19 HP more power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Polo. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |