Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Suzuki Swift 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 92 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 116 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 8 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis, Suzuki Jimny | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 22 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 198 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Aveo has 22 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`485 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Suzuki Swift has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Swift, so Suzuki Swift quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |