Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 65 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 112 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 19 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 4 cm shorter than the Skoda Fabia, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1015 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 40 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |