Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Rover 25 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 123 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Rover 25 is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 19 HP less power than Rover 25, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Rover 25. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Rover 25, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Rover 200, Rover 400, Rover 45 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Rover 25 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Rover 25 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is smaller, but higher. Chevrolet Aveo is 7 cm shorter than the Rover 25, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 304 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1086 litres | |
|
Rover 25 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 84 litres less trunk space than the Rover 25. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Rover 25 has
| |