Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Colt is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.55 m | |
| Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Aveo has 65 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Colt has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Colt, so Mitsubishi Colt quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |