Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Mazda 2 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 80 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda 2, but torque is 10 NM less than Mazda 2. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Ford Fiesta, Ford Fusion | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda 2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Mazda 2 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1044 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 47 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda 2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`495 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 100 percent more cases than Mazda 2, so Mazda 2 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |