Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Hyundai Getz 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Getz is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Getz, whereas torque is 11 NM less than Hyundai Getz. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Getz. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Getz might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Getz engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 10 cm longer than the Hyundai Getz, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 254 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 977 litres | |
|
Hyundai Getz has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 34 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Getz. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Hyundai Getz has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Hyundai Getz, so Hyundai Getz quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Hyundai Getz has
| |