Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 21 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Aveo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`503 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |