Chevrolet Aveo 2008 vs Volkswagen Polo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 HP | 85 HP | |
| Torque: | 114 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Polo is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo and Volkswagen Polo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 220 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Chevrolet Aveo has 50 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`503 | 1`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volkswagen Polo has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Volkswagen Polo quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |