Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Kia RIO 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 94 HP | 97 HP | |
Torque: | 131 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 3 HP less power than Kia RIO. Despite less power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
The Kia RIO is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
750 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
420 km with real consumption | 460 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.31 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 7 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Kia RIO has
| |