Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Skoda Fabia 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Aveo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Skoda Fabia) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 15.8 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 25 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, but torque is 24 NM less than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 5.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 300 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Fabia gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 9 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
400 litres | 789 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Fabia (by 389 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`535 kg | 1`675 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`070 kg | 1`160 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 515 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Skoda Fabia has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Skoda Fabia quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |