Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Skoda Fabia 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 19 HP more power than Skoda Fabia, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Skoda Fabia. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Fabia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Kalos | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Audi A2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Fabia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 9 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 6 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 438 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 789 litres | |
|
Skoda Fabia has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 63 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Fabia. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Skoda Fabia, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Chevrolet Aveo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Fabia has serious deffects in 160 percent more cases than Chevrolet Aveo, so Chevrolet Aveo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |