Chevrolet Aveo 2004 vs Dacia Logan 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Chevrolet Aveo) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Dacia Logan) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 131 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 24 HP more power than Dacia Logan, but torque is 29 NM less than Dacia Logan. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 600 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
| Dacia Logan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Lacetti, Chevrolet Kalos | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Logan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chevrolet Aveo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.31 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
400 litres | no data | |
|
Dacia Logan has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Dacia Logan, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`535 kg | 1`540 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`070 kg | 1`075 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 465 kg | 465 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Dacia Logan has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Chevrolet Aveo, so Dacia Logan quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Dacia Logan has
| |