Chevrolet Aveo 2006 vs Kia RIO 2009
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 72 HP | 97 HP | |
Torque: | 104 NM | n/a NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Kia RIO is a more dynamic driving. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 25 HP less power than Kia RIO. Due to the lower power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 6.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
The Chevrolet Aveo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia RIO. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
640 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.31 m | 4.24 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chevrolet Aveo is 7 cm longer than the Kia RIO, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 375 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`490 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Kia RIO has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Kia RIO, so Kia RIO quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia RIO has
| |