Chevrolet Aveo 2011 vs Peugeot 206 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 155 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 5 HP more power than Peugeot 206, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Peugeot 206. Despite the higher power, Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 206 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206, which means that by driving the Chevrolet Aveo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 46 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 206 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chevrolet Cruze, Chevrolet Trax | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 206 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Peugeot 206 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 206 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger. Chevrolet Aveo is 37 cm longer than the Peugeot 206, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 502 litres | 313 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
698 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo has more luggage capacity. Chevrolet Aveo has 189 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`598 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |