Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 31 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chevrolet Aveo consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 430 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Chevrolet Aveo 2003 1.6 engine: Durable, easy to repair, long-lasting engine, not very demanding on fuel quality.
Engine often leaks oil, which tends to cause other problems. The EGR valve can also cause problems, and many users choose to ... More about Chevrolet Aveo 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |