Chevrolet Aveo 2003 vs Volkswagen Fox 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 124 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is more dynamic to drive. Chevrolet Aveo engine produces 19 HP more power than Volkswagen Fox, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Volkswagen Fox. Thanks to more power Chevrolet Aveo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Fox is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chevrolet Aveo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chevrolet Aveo could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chevrolet Aveo consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Fox. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 420 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Fox gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.88 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Chevrolet Aveo is larger, but lower. Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Fox, 1 cm wider, while the height of Chevrolet Aveo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 175 litres | 260 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
980 litres | 1016 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Fox has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chevrolet Aveo has 85 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Fox. This could mean that the Chevrolet Aveo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Fox (by 36 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chevrolet Aveo is 1.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Fox, which means Chevrolet Aveo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`535 | 1`520 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Volkswagen Fox has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chevrolet Aveo has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volkswagen Fox, so Volkswagen Fox quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chevrolet Aveo has
|
Volkswagen Fox has
| |